Posts

Why Your Company's Training Budget is Being Wasted

Three months ago, I walked into a client's offices in Melbourne to find their entire sales team sitting through their third "customer service excellence" workshop this year. The same bloody workshop. Same facilitator, same PowerPoint slides, same role-playing exercises about dealing with "difficult customers." When I asked the sales manager why they kept repeating it, he shrugged and said, "Head office says we need to spend the training budget."

That's when it hit me. We're not training people anymore—we're ticking boxes.

After fifteen years of watching companies flush training budgets down the drain, I've seen every mistake in the book. And trust me, there are plenty. The problem isn't that businesses don't care about development. It's that they've turned learning into a bureaucratic exercise that benefits no one except the training providers counting their profits.

The Copy-Paste Mentality Is Killing Growth

Here's what drives me mental: companies treating training like fast food. One size fits all, mass-produced, delivered with zero consideration for individual needs or business context. I've sat through countless generic "leadership development" sessions where participants from vastly different industries get the exact same content.

Last year, I witnessed a pharmaceutical company putting their R&D scientists through the same teamwork exercises as a construction crew. Scientists who spend their days in labs, analysing data and working independently, forced to build towers out of spaghetti and marshmallows to "improve collaboration." The disconnect was so obvious it was painful.

But here's the kicker—the feedback forms all came back positive. Why? Because people are conditioned to be polite about training, even when it's completely irrelevant. The real test isn't what participants think immediately after; it's what they're actually doing differently six months later.

The Measurement Myth

Speaking of measurement, let's talk about how spectacularly we're failing at this. Most companies measure training success by:

Number of people trained ✓
Hours of training delivered ✓
Participant satisfaction scores ✓

What they don't measure:

Actual behaviour change
Performance improvements
Return on investment
Skills application on the job

It's like judging a restaurant by how many meals they serve instead of whether the food actually tastes good. The metrics are completely backwards.

I remember working with a telecommunications company that proudly announced they'd trained 2,400 employees in "digital transformation" over twelve months. Impressive numbers. But when we dug deeper, nobody could articulate what digital transformation actually meant for their specific role. The training had been delivered, the boxes were ticked, but the transformation never happened.

The Real Reason Training Fails

Here's what nobody wants to admit: most training fails because it's divorced from real work challenges. We take people away from their desks, put them in conference rooms, and expect them to magically transfer theoretical knowledge back to complex, messy workplace situations.

The best time management training I've ever seen wasn't in a classroom at all. It was a manager working alongside her team for a week, observing their actual workflows, identifying bottlenecks, and coaching them through real scenarios. No PowerPoint presentations, no generic productivity apps—just practical problem-solving.

Compare that to the typical approach: death by PowerPoint in a sterile training room, followed by a few weeks of good intentions before everyone reverts to old habits. The research shows that without reinforcement and practical application, people forget 75% of training content within six months. Yet we keep doing the same thing and expecting different results.

That's not training. That's expensive procrastination.

The Facilitator Factor

Let me be brutally honest about something that makes training providers uncomfortable: not all facilitators are created equal. The industry is flooded with people who can deliver content but can't actually coach, mentor, or facilitate real learning.

I've seen "leadership experts" who've never managed a team. Communication trainers who put audiences to sleep. Project management gurus who couldn't organise a barbecue, let alone a complex initiative.

The best trainers I know aren't necessarily the ones with the most certifications. They're the ones who've done the work, made the mistakes, and can bridge the gap between theory and practice. They ask uncomfortable questions, challenge assumptions, and focus on outcomes rather than activities.

Technology Isn't the Silver Bullet

Before you think I'm some dinosaur who hates innovation, let me be clear: technology can enhance learning. But it's not a magic wand that transforms bad training into good training.

E-learning platforms, virtual reality simulations, AI-powered personalisation—all useful tools when applied thoughtfully. But slapping technology onto poorly designed content is like putting racing stripes on a broken-down car. It might look faster, but it's still not going anywhere.

I've seen companies spend fortunes on sophisticated learning management systems that nobody uses because the content is still boring, irrelevant, or poorly designed. Meanwhile, some of the most effective training I've observed happens through simple methods: peer mentoring, job shadowing, and structured reflection sessions.

The Australian Context Nobody Talks About

Here's something that gets overlooked in our rush to import overseas training programs: Australia has a unique business culture that requires tailored approaches. What works in Silicon Valley doesn't necessarily translate to Perth mining operations or Melbourne financial services.

We're more direct in our communication style, less hierarchical in our organisational structures, and more informal in our professional relationships. Yet most training programs are designed for generic global audiences, missing the nuances that make learning stick in Australian workplaces.

I remember facilitating a communication skills session for a mining company where the imported American content kept talking about "elevator pitches." Half the participants worked on remote sites where the only elevator was the one taking them underground. The examples were so disconnected from their reality that the whole session became irrelevant.

What Actually Works

After years of seeing what doesn't work, I've identified the common characteristics of training that actually creates change:

It solves real problems. The best training addresses specific challenges that people face in their actual jobs. Not theoretical scenarios, not textbook case studies, but the messy, complicated situations they deal with every day.

It's timed right. Learning happens best when people need the knowledge immediately. Just-in-time training beats just-in-case training every time. Teach someone Excel formulas the day before they need to build a complex spreadsheet, not six months earlier when they'll forget everything.

It involves practice. You can't learn to ride a bike by watching videos or attending lectures. The same principle applies to business skills. People need opportunities to practice new behaviours in safe environments before applying them in high-stakes situations.

It includes follow-up. One-off training events are like one-night stands—temporarily satisfying but ultimately meaningless. Sustained learning requires ongoing support, coaching, and accountability.

The companies that get this right don't just train their people; they build learning into their culture. They create environments where experimentation is encouraged, mistakes are learning opportunities, and continuous improvement is everyone's responsibility.

The Leadership Blind Spot

Here's where things get uncomfortable for senior executives: leaders often exempt themselves from the very training they mandate for others. They send their teams to communication workshops while demonstrating poor communication themselves. They invest in customer service training while creating policies that frustrate customers.

The message this sends is clear: training is for other people, not for us important decision-makers. This undermines the entire learning culture and reinforces the perception that training is remedial rather than developmental.

I've worked with CEOs who couldn't understand why their customer service initiatives weren't working, despite investing heavily in staff training. The answer was usually found in their own behaviour—unrealistic expectations, insufficient resources, or contradictory messages that neutralised whatever learning had occurred.

Making Training Count

So what can you do if you're responsible for training budgets and want actual results instead of just completed certificates?

Start with problems, not solutions. Before booking another workshop, identify specific performance gaps or business challenges that learning could address. What are people struggling with? Where are the biggest opportunities for improvement?

Get leaders involved. Not just as sponsors or cheerleaders, but as active participants and role models. If the CEO won't attend the leadership program, why should anyone else take it seriously?

Focus on application. Build reflection time into training programs. Require participants to identify specific actions they'll take and check back on progress. Create peer learning groups where people can share experiences and support each other's development.

Measure what matters. Track behaviour change, not just satisfaction scores. Look for evidence that learning is being applied: improved performance metrics, changed processes, better customer feedback.

Most importantly, be prepared to stop doing things that aren't working. Just because you've always run annual compliance training doesn't mean you should keep doing it if it's not creating value.

The Uncomfortable Truth

Here's something most training providers won't tell you: sometimes the best solution isn't more training. Sometimes people need better systems, clearer processes, different tools, or simply permission to do their jobs effectively.

I once worked with a retail company convinced they had a customer service training problem. After observing their operations, it became clear the real issue was an understaffed complaints department with outdated technology and no authority to resolve customer issues. No amount of training was going to fix systemic problems.

Before investing in training, ask whether the performance gap is really about knowledge and skills, or whether it's about motivation, resources, or organisational barriers. Training is expensive therapy for problems that might be better solved through management action.

The most successful companies I work with don't just train their way to success. They create conditions where people can apply their skills effectively, remove obstacles that prevent good performance, and align learning with business strategy.

That's how you stop wasting your training budget and start building a workforce that can actually deliver results.

Further Reading: Why Professional Development Matters | Training ROI Strategies | Communication Skills Development